Author: Avishai Harris

  • So You Hate Your Major… Now What?

    Imposter syndrome is a phrase that many people in academia are uniquely familiar with. The feeling that maybe you aren’t smart enough for your major or that you were accepted into your college by mistake is fairly common in these spaces. For me personally, I had always had an interest in engineering and knew that I wanted to pursue it, but I was confronted with a rude awakening during my freshman year as a mechanical engineer. What if engineering just wasn’t for me?

    Rose Clance and Suzanne Imes coined the term imposter phenomenon in their 1978 study regarding how high-achieving women often “maintain a strong belief that they are not intelligent; in fact, they are convinced that they have fooled anyone who thinks otherwise.” They describe reasons why this phenomenon is highly present in women, usually involving societal stereotypes and familial pressure, and in the STEM field, this pressure is often intensified. I know that in my case, it was always apparent that I was one of the few girls interested in engineering, making me question my belonging, and this feeling was not aided once I was accepted to Georgia Tech, where conversations around affirmative action amplified my doubts.

    Besides the societal pressures around being a woman of color in the STEM field, I also found myself doing worse in my math and science classes while succeeding in social sciences and literature. Not only was I not enjoying the coursework that was foundational to my major, but I was bad at it.

    I started to feel out of place around my peers and began to doubt that I was qualified to be an engineer after I graduated. I felt that if I couldn’t “overcome” a physics class or personal doubts, I would be better off switching majors to cater to my academic strengths. This idea is not uncommon, as highlighted by Rosaling Gill and Ngaire Donaghue and defined by them as the “hidden injuries of academia.” The stress was discouraging me, and the only advice I was offered was individualistic self-help.

    However, many of my feelings changed when I took the course on engineering ethics. It was a social science class that combined all of the things I enjoyed and had a passion for. I was able to write, identify problems in the engineering process, and review case studies that involved analyses only an engineering professional could perform. From here, I knew the direction I intended to go with my degree. I was not the hands-on woodworking girl boss that I had convinced myself I needed to be as a woman in engineering. Instead, I was better at design, programming, and risk analysis. This process of discovery was not easy, but it was very worth every minute.

    The psychological and societal aspects associated with imposter syndrome are hard to identify, defy, and sometimes understand. However, one solution on a larger scale may be to retract from individualism. Imposter syndrome is often and most notably associated with isolation, which can fester irrational feelings of self-doubt. Building community and exploring different avenues related to your passions are valuable tools for finding your place and contributing to the constantly adapting world. It is okay to feel like an imposter, and you are not alone, but your individualism is how you present new perspectives to your field, not your isolation from it.

    Sources

  • AI and VR: A New Reality

    Reality is defined by the world we live in and the rules it is bound by. Physics, time, societal norms—these are all things that limit us to what we call our reality. But what if we could generate a new reality to live in? A virtual reality.

    Virtual reality, or VR, is a computer-generated simulation designed to immerse participants in an artificial world that they can interact with and explore through the use of a headset and other accessories. Many people, including myself, have joined the craze with excitement, using the technology for both recreation and education, interacting with other users, experiencing 360 videos, or just playing immersive games. The top tech companies have begun their race to develop their visions for these worlds, with Apple being one of the most recent producers of their own headsets.

    The Apple Vision Pro is “Apple’s first spatial operating system” that allows you to use your hands, eyes, and voice to create intuitive interactions around you. The feature “EyeSight” tells other people what you’re doing while using the headset, and from one review, the experience is similar to viewing your phone directly through your eyes. At the current price point of $3500, it’s not a product that everyone will be quick to get their hands on, but only time will tell how popular it will become as the design becomes sleeker and the interest becomes more mainstream.

    However, as with all new developments, we have to stop and ask ourselves: Is this the right way to go? It seems like there may be a good argument against it.

    My first introduction to the Apple Vision Pro was a video by YouTube creator Eddy Burback. In his video, he discussed the difficulties he had with its setup, grievances with its price point given its limitations, and most interestingly, the implications and ethical concerns for this product and the overall push for more social interaction in the virtual world.

    Hadi Ardiny and Esmaeel Khanmirza vouch for the technology as a concept, noting that the integration of technology like virtual reality into education helps students gain hands on understanding and experience abstract concepts that they otherwise wouldn’t be able to. Other forms of computer generated reality have brought peace to grieving family members through realistic holograms of deceased loved ones, though that topic brings about moral questions of its own (Stein, 508). I have personally used VR as a means to teach about space in STEMcomm’s ASF After Dark event and can see its benefits. However, these benefits have yet to outweigh the negatives for me.

    The idea that we are currently in a “loneliness epidemic” is an interesting perspective to incorporate into this conversation. Dilip V. Jeste, Ellen E. Lee, and Stephanie Cacioppo hypothesize that “there is probably a common underlying thread of social anomie and disconnection resulting from the rapid growth of technology, social media, globalization, and polarization of societies… Information overload, 24-hour connectivity, countless but superficial and sometimes harmful social media relationships, and heightened competition have elevated the level of stress in the modern society.” This sentiment was shared not only by Burback when discussing the peculiar push of an AI chat bot while using the headset but also by Yi Mou and Kun Xu’s research into human-AI social interactions. In their study, they found that users of the application WeChat showed higher levels of neuroticism and were less conscientious when conversing with AI. With this, the question is then posed: will computer manufacturing ever truly substitute in-person social reactions? Or, more importantly, should it?

    I tend to agree with the philosopher Albert Borgmann, who is of the opinion that technology is a tool that, when mishandled or taken for granted, can devalue craftsmanship and the rich community ties that uphold our society. Though I don’t believe that the Apple Vision Pro will cause the downfall of our society, I find that we should be wary of its ability and intention to pull people away from our reality. New technology will always be exciting and often beneficial to the masses, but I think that it is important to be both open-minded and skeptical, inquisitive yet grounded.

    Sources
    Ardiny, H., & Khanmirza, E. (2018). The role of AR and VR Technologies in education developments: Opportunities and challenges. 2018 6th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (IcRoM), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/icrom.2018.8657615

    Burback, E. (2024, March 29). Apple’s $3500 nightmare. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLMZPlIufA0

    Fallman, D. (2009). A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction. AI & SOCIETY, 25(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0234-1

    Jeste, D. V., Lee, E. E., & Cacioppo, S. (2020). Battling the modern behavioral epidemic of loneliness. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(6), 553–554. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0027

    Mou, Y., & Xu, K. (2017). The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-ai social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.067

    Stein, J.-P. (2021). Conjuring up the departed in virtual reality: The good, the bad, and the potentially ugly. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000315